Page 17 - LabMedya English - 03

17
www.labmedya.com/en

Massachusetts, observed something caution from an ethical perspective.”
similar when she studied how people
interact with Pleo, a toy dinosaur robot. The obvious conclusion is that rights
Pleo doesn’t look lifelike it’s obviously ought to be accorded not on the basis
a toy. But it’s programmed to act and of biology but on something even more
speak in ways that suggest not only a fundamental: personhood.
form of intelligence but also the ability
to experience suffering. If you hold Pleo WHAT RIGHTS?
upside-down, it will whimper and tell
you to stop. If we wind up recognizing some
intelligent machine as a person, which
In an effort to see just how far we legal rights would we be obliged to
might go in extending compassion bestow on it? If it could pass the Turing
to simple robots, Darling encouraged test, we might feel it would deserve at
participants at a recent workshop to least the right to continued existence.
play with Pleo and then asked them to But Robert Sparrow, a philosopher
destroy it. Almost all refused. “People at Monash University in Melbourne,
are primed, subconsciously, to treat Australia, thinks that’s just the
robots like living things, even though beginning. What happens, he wonders, if
on a conscious level, on a rational level, a machine’s “mind” is even greater than
we totally understand that they’re not a human’s? In a piece that appeared
real,” Darling says.While neither Pleo recently on TheCritique.com, he writes:
nor Spot can feel pain, Darling believes “Indeed, not only would it be just as
it’s worth paying attention to how we wrong to kill a machine that could pass
treat these entities. “If it is disturbing the Turing test as to kill an adult human
to us to behave violently towards them being, but, depending on the capacities
if there’s something that feels wrong of the machine, it might even be more
about it maybe that’s a piece of our wrong.” TURKISH
empathy that we don’t want to turn off,
because it could influence how we treat Maybe that makes sense from the
perspective of pure logic. But Ryan Calo,
other living things,” she says. (This is an expert in robotics and cyber law at SIGNATURE
a key question raised by the TV series
Westworld, in which guests at a theme the University of Washington in Seattle, FOR GENETIC
park are encouraged to treat ultra- says our laws are unlikely to bend that
lifelike humanoid robots however they far. “Our legal system reflects our basic
please.) some sort of artificial person, “it would DIAGNOSIS
biology,” he says. If we one day invent
CONVERSING WITH ROBOTS break everything about the law, as we OF
understand it today.”
For now, mistreating Pleo or any other
existing robot is no crime as long as entity’s right to have its own interests HEMOPHILIA
For Andrews, the key issue is the
you’re the owner. But what about
mistreating a bot that we believed really recognized. Of course, it may be tricky
had some form of consciousness? determining what those interests are
And how would we be able to tell if a just as it can be hard for people from Hemophilia genetic test kit is the success of my work.”
machine has a mind in the first place? one culture to understand the desires first time in the world was produced Onay points out that there are
at the Faculty of Medicine of Ege
treatments of this disease, “For
Computer science pioneer Alan Turing of people from another. But when we University by Associate Professor this reason, genetic diagnosis is
pondered this question half a century recognize something as a person, Hüseyin Onay. very important. There are a few
ago. The way Turing saw it, we can we’re obligated to at least try to do advantages to this recognition.
never know for sure what a machine the right thing, she says. “If we realize Ege University (EÜ) Medical Faculty It determines the severity of the
is feeling or experiencing so our best that something is actually a ‘someone,’ Hospital Department of Medical disease. We can prevent the next
bet is simply to see if we can carry on then we have to take their interests into Genetics Associate Professor generation or a sick individual
a conversation with it just as if it were account.” Hüseyin Onay developed the from having a sick sibling. At the
human (what we now call the Turing “first” test kit for the detection of same time, genetic diagnosis is
hemophilia, which is difficult to
very important in determining
test). And perhaps it’s not so far-fetched diagnose genetically. Onay said in the patient, who is resistant to
to imagine that those interests might a statement he did nearly 100.000 treatment.”
Given the complexity of human include continued existence in which tests in his college for 15 years. Onay reported that a kit for the
conversation, building a machine case we might want to think twice genetic diagnosis of hemophilia
capable of engaging in lengthy verbal before reaching for the off button. Onay reported that hemorrhagic has not been produced so far in the
exchanges is a daunting task. But if disorder was directed towards the world and he expressed the pride of
we could build such a machine, Turing The Rise of Smart Machines Puts Spotlight on hemophilia disorder, “Until now, no accomplishing this.
standard method has been found
argued, we ought to treat it as though ‘Robot Rights’ was originally published by NBC to be used in the genetic diagnosis Onay emphasizes the use of the kit
it’s a thinking, feeling being. Universal Media, LLC on December 4, 2017 by Dan of this condition, which can cause they produce, “In this way we have
Mark Goldfeder, an Atlanta-based rabbi Falk. Copyright 2017 NBC Universal Media, LLC. All deaths. From here I have completed produced an approved hemophilia
and law professor, has reached a similar rights reserved. the study I started on the kit, which genetic diagnostic kit in the world.
conclusion: If an entity acts human, he will provide the genetic diagnosis of We are planning to introduce and
wrote recently, “I can not start poking it hemophilia. My previous experience market this product in foreign trade
to see if it bleeds. I have a responsibility was an important factor in the fairs and scientific congresses.”
to treat all that seem human as humans,
and it is better to err on the side of